PUT OUR KNOWLEDGE & EXPERIENCE TO WORK CLICK HERE TO GET STARTED
Man facing online hate

Can You Be Sued for Defamation Based on Social Media Posts?

Pakis, Giotes, Burleson & Deaconson, P.C. Jan. 1, 2026

In Texas, defamation law protects individuals against false statements that harm their reputation. Whether the statement is written (libel) or spoken (slander), a person may face a lawsuit if it causes demonstrable harm. 

In today’s digital world, social media has become a dominant platform for communication, expression, and connection. While platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram allow us to share opinions and experiences instantly, they also create a legal minefield. Statements made online, even in casual conversation or during a heated debate, can lead to serious legal consequences. 

As attorneys at Pakis, Giotes, Burleson & Deaconson, P.C., we frequently encounter cases involving claims arising from social media posts. Understanding the nuances of Waco, Texas, defamation law is crucial for anyone who shares content, whether publicly or privately, online. For individuals traversing online discourse, understanding when a post crosses the line from opinion to actionable defamation is critical. Speaking with a strategic attorney is highly beneficial to seek the outcome you deserve.

Defamation Law in Texas

Texas defamation law is designed to protect individuals from false statements that damage their reputation. The law distinguishes between libel, which involves written or published statements, and slander, which involves spoken words. 

Social media posts are generally considered libel because they are recorded in a permanent medium that can be widely distributed. The essential elements of a defamation claim in Texas include:

  1. A false statement presented as fact

  2. Publication or communication of the statement to a third party

  3. Fault amounting to at least negligence

  4. Harm or damages resulting from the statement

Establishing these elements can be challenging, especially when the statements are subjective opinions rather than factual assertions. In Texas, truth is an absolute defense to defamation claims. 

Therefore, if the statement can be proven true, a lawsuit will not succeed. Additionally, statements made about public figures require a higher standard of proof, including actual malice, which means the speaker knew the statement was false or acted with reckless disregard for the truth.

We frequently advise clients on assessing whether their statements could be construed as defamatory under Texas law and on the steps to take to protect themselves from potential liability.

How Social Media Amplifies Defamation Risks

Social media’s immediacy and reach amplify the risk of defamation claims. Unlike private conversations, posts can be shared, forwarded, or commented on by hundreds or thousands of people. 

Once a post is online, it can be nearly impossible to retract completely, even if deleted later. Courts consider the publication to have occurred at the time of the original posting, and damages can be calculated based on the breadth of dissemination.

Online anonymity further complicates matters. Some users may feel emboldened to make false statements under a pseudonym, believing that legal accountability is unlikely. However, Texas courts have mechanisms to identify anonymous speakers through subpoenas and discovery, making anonymity no guarantee of protection. 

Social media users must be aware that defamatory content can follow them indefinitely, potentially affecting personal relationships, employment, and professional reputation.

In practice, we see that social media defamation often escalates quickly because posts provoke immediate reactions. Retaliatory comments, viral sharing, and news coverage can all contribute to the scope of damages in a lawsuit. Understanding these dynamics is key for anyone seeking to limit exposure while maintaining their freedom of expression.

Defending Against a Social Media Defamation Claim

When someone faces a defamation claim arising from a social media post, several defenses may be available under Texas law. These defenses often hinge on proving that the statement was true, constituted an opinion, or fell within a legally protected category of speech. The primary defenses include:

  • Truth of the statement

  • Statements of opinion or rhetorical hyperbole

  • Privileged communications in certain contexts, such as court proceedings or legislative matters

  • Lack of publication to a third party

We frequently advise clients to gather evidence supporting these defenses, including screenshots, timestamps, witness statements, and context surrounding the post. Proper documentation can significantly influence the outcome of a defamation case and may deter frivolous claims from advancing.

Knowledgeable Legal Assistance

By understanding the elements of defamation, the unique risks of social media, and the available defenses, individuals can protect their reputation while exercising their right to free expression. For anyone who has received a defamation notice or is concerned about potential liability from social media activity, early consultation with experienced counsel is critical. 

At Pakis, Giotes, Burleson & Deaconson, P.C., we guide our clients through these challenging situations, protecting their interests and helping them make informed decisions. Defamation law is nuanced, and when it intersects with social media, having knowledgeable representation can make all the difference. We’re proud to serve Waco, Texas, and the surrounding communities. Call today to get started.